Elections and Durable Governments in Parliamentary Democracies
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper provides a theory of a parliamentary government system with proportional representation elections and policy-motivated parties and voters. In a symmetric, spatial model governments are majoritarian, they and their policies are durable, and voters elect minority parliaments in every period. A continuum of (Markov) political equilibria exist with policies that represent concessions to centrist voters. In these equilibria the government parties have equal representation and are equal partners. The greater the concession the more politically patient the parties must be for an equilibrium to exist. If one party is more centrally-located in the space of voter preferences, it can receive a majority and choose its ideal policy. If reallocable officeholding benefits are available, the policy of a durable government favors the leader of government and changes when the leader changes. In the elections the out party loses half its vote share to one of the government parties. If crises can occur, governments can fall, but a new government forms after the next election. If crises are sufficiently likely, no political equilibrium exists. The theory provides explanations for three empirical findings: a Gamson’s law for a spatial model, an analogue of Duverger’s law for proportional representation electoral systems, and compensational voting where voters give the out party additional votes. ∗655 Knight Way, Stanford CA 94305. [email protected]. (650)723-3757 (P), (650) 724-9649 (F).
منابع مشابه
Modelling Cabinet Networks in Parliamentary Democracies
Parliamentary democracies represent a common type of governance structure in numerous countries. While details vary from one country to another, the structure of a parliamentary democracy entails having cabinet ministers who each have a specific portfolio of policy interests, such as healthcare, industry, or education. A set of ministers forms a government, and such governments can change due t...
متن کاملGovernment Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies
In this paper we consider a dynamic model of government formation and termination in parliamentary democracies that accounts for the following phenomena: (1) Cabinet terminations due to replacement or early election (2) Cabinet reshuf°es (3) Minority and Surplus governments; (4) the relative instability of minority governments. JEL classi ̄cation: D72, H19, C73.
متن کاملA Structural Model of Government Formation
The defining feature of parliamentary democracies is the fact that the executive derives its mandate from and is politically responsible to the legislature. This implies that who forms the government is not determined by an election alone, but is the outcome of a bargaining process among the parties represented in the parliament. Furthermore, it implies that the government may terminate at any ...
متن کاملTelevision and Political Persuasion in Young Democracies: Evidence from Russia
Governments control media in much of the developing world. Does this have an effect on political choices of voters? We address this question using exogenous variation in the availability of the signal of the only independent from the government national TV channel in Russia during the 1999 parliamentary elections. We find that the presence of an independent source of political news on TV signif...
متن کاملDEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND REGIME SURVIVAL: Parliamentary and Presidential Democracies Reconsidered
We review arguments and empirical evidence found in the comparative literature that bear on the differences in the survival rates of parliamentary and presidential democracies. Most of these arguments focus on the fact that presidential democracies are based on the separation of executive and legislative powers, while parliamentary democracies are based on the fusion of these powers. From this ...
متن کامل